Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19750109~~~ Chairman Garrett inquired of the County Administrator, if he was aware that a report from the Tax Collector to the Board of Commissioners was due on the first Monday in February. The matter of Executive Session of the Board of Adjustments was discussed by the Board. The Count Attorney stated that in his opinion that the Board of AdJ'ust- ments is a quasi judicial body but he was also of the opinion that the Board of Adjustments is an administrative body, therefore, when it hears appeals from a decision of the Zoning Board then these appeals should be heard in Executive Session, however, when it attends to only administrative matters then it should sit in open meeting. ~ Discussion ensued. The Board advised the County Attorney that they wanted him to research the question of Executive Sessions for the Board of Adjustments as they did not wish to have any County Board operating in violation of the General Statu6es. There being no further business to come before the Board, the Board adjourned to meet again on Thursday, January 9, at 8 P.M, in the Commissioners Room at the ' Gourthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina. Flora Garrett, Chairman Betty June Hayes, Clerk Approved Items filed: .Food stamp report from Orange County Department of Social Services. ~ MINUTES OF THE ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMTSSIONERS January 9, 1975 The Orange County Board of Commissioners met on Thursday, January 9, 1975, at 8 P.M., in the Coa¢nissianers Room at the Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina. Members Present: Chairman Flora Garrett, Commissioners Norm Gustaveson, Jan Pinney, Norman Walker, and Richard E. Whitted.: Members Absent: None. Sam Gattis, County Administrator, Neal Evans, Fiscal Officer, and Betty June Hayes, Clerk, were also present. Chairman Garrett inquired of the Board members if they would agree to hear a request from Lansford Long, Assistant District Attorney, as the matter was of some urgency. Mr. Long stated that there had been a rash number of breaking and enterings in the County. The State now has a witness who can testify in a breaking and entering case if monies were available to get him from his military base back to the County for the trial. Mr. Long stated that the State has no monies that it can allocate to bring this witness from out of State, therefore, he is requesting the Board to appropriate $180.00 for air fare. Discussion ensued. Upon motion of Commissioner Pinney, seconded by Commissioner Gustaveson, it was moved and adopted that the Board take $180.00 from the Contingency Fund to pay for the return of a witness in order that this witness might appear in court. Chairman Garrett stated that the purpose of this meeting tonight was to receive __ a report from the Community Development Task Force. The following report was filed by Marilyn Riddle: t (~:~:.~ "The Task Force for Community Development has determined in its two meetings that the following items could be included in Orange County's application for Community Development funds. These are listed as the Task Force has ranked them with relevant discussion included. 1. Water resources and sewage extension and treatment. Specifically the Task Force agreed that funds should be requested tb im lament sewage extension and treatment programs proposed through studies~ed with 208 and 201 funding. Community development funds are not to be requested for engineering studies or surveys since these can be funded under the other programs now in progress. Other comments by the Task Force included concern about specific areas such as Fairview Community, West Hillsborough, and trailer park sanitation. However, no agreement was reached that it was this group's responsibility to i target certain areas since most members felt that a comprehensive survey of -" needs would have to be done before such targeting would be possible. The group's concern about water resources was not discussed after Mr. Burnham indicated that other programs are available which specifically address the problems of water resources. 2. Under the general discussion of problems of housing rehabilitation the Task Force reached some agreement on these ideas: Community development funds could be used to provide fora rural rehabilitation housing coordinator, full time, with a staff of two or three rehabilitation crew supervisors. The coordinator would help eligible Orange County citizens to apply for Farm Home Administration funds already available, and would identify and implement other housing rehabilitation programs now available or which may become available in the future. Ms. Mace indicated that rehabilitation crew supervisors and Manpower program trainees can provide low-cost labor in rehabilitation program and thereby increase the value of funds loaned for rehabilitation purposes. The Task Force felt that two or three such rehabilitation crews could be effectively used by the County. Need something more than a loan program fund to guarantee loans. Members of the Task Force placed a lower priority on a rent subsidy program. However, proposal was made that the c~~*+ity development funds could be utilized to provide fox implementation of an existing program -- the Section 8 leasing program -- for rehabilitating rental property. This could be included as a mandate of the rural housing coordinator. Members of the Task Force generally agreed that the Commissioners should consider setting a goal that all Orange County housing be brought up to minimum standard in the next 10 years. This includes providing for a program of code enforcement beginning at a specified future date. 3. The third priority seemed to be a comprehensive program of community centers. There was not time to cover this in great depth; however, these specific suggestions were made: That community development funds be utilized to rehabilitate existing buildings in corruuunities in the county (such as schools which have been closed, or other suitable buildings) for the purpose of providing space for such programs as: day care, after-school care, Head Start, adult education, day care for elderly citizens, scheduled clinics (well child, immunization, screening, etc) meals for elderly citizens, and recreation programs. The Task Force was unable to agree to recommend any of these programs for specific funding, it agreed only to provision of facilities. It also tentatively agreed that community development funds could be requested to provide personnel -- probably a County coordinator of community service programs and appropriate staff -- to assure that communities can maintain ` active viable programs in their Centers. 4. Many members of the Task Force placed a high priority on extension of fire protection to northern Orange and areas in southern Orange not presently protected. However, citizens who visited the Task Force meeting suggested that the whole issue of fire protection in Orange County needs study. It was proposed that the County utilize the services of the North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating Bureau to redraw fire district lines. This would allow a unified county fire tax rate and assure .county-wide fire protection. The citizens also urged that a County Fire Marshall be employed. Enough members of the Task Force expressed concern about fire protection so that it is included as an item for consideration. However, other members of the Task Force suggested that the Commissioners be urged to look into this matter themselves to see what might be done. The Commissioners may wish to consider including a request for personnel costs for a County Fire Marshall in the community development request. =~~ S. Health care needs were discussed, specifically the possibility of purchasing and equipping a van for the purpose of providing mobile clinic service on a scheduled basis to outlying communities in the county. It was suggested by one of the planners present that more health care services may be available to the County than are now being utilized and that the Gommissioners should investigate this. Members of the Task Force understood from the planners that health care needs might not receive a favorable reaction from HUD since DHEG1 funds are more appropriate for such programs. Other items suggested but not discussed were job training and retraining; employment; and comprehensive planning for public utilities. Since there was not time to discuss these the Task Force has no specific proposals to make concerning them." Discussion ensued on each of the recommendations that were presented by the Task Force. Mark Burnham explained the 201 and 2D8 funding. Under the Community Development Act it could serve as an extension of these studies. The 201 funding for Hillsborough could be funded under the 208 program. The question was asked, "What is the role of Region J itt this matter?" It was pointed out that the Board has between now and tomorrow to make a priority listing. Commissioner Gustaveson asked, "Woujd it be helpful in terms of the immediacy of the situation if the Board took action on some of the proposals?" Another member asked "How could the Counties application be tied in with Hillsborough and Carrboro?" Further Discussion ensued. Chairman Garrett stated that she felt the Board should be specific and identify the areas of need relative to water and sewerage. Upon motion of Commissioner Gustaveson, seconded by Commissioner Whitted, it was moved, that the County accept the report .of the Task Force and that Items ~~1, 2, & 3 become the first priorities for the first three (3) year period of the grant. Commissioner Walker stated that he could vote for the motion provided that the Board include Item ~~4 in its list of priorities in that the areas that did not currently have fire protection were those areas that did not have the destiny required for the supporting of afire district. He stated that these funds might be used to subsidize the areas. Further discussion ensued. Gommissioner Pinney moved to amend the motion of Commissioner Gustaveson to include Items 4~4 & 5 of the Task Force as a part of the Pre-Application Grant. Commissioner Gustaveson and Whitted agreed to the amendment of their motion. Chairman Garrett called for the vote on the amended motion and the original motion. All members voted aye. There being no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned to meet again on Tuesday, January 14, 1975, at 8 P.M. in the Commissioners Room at the Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina. ~~~ ~ Flora Garrett, Chairman Betty June Hayes, Clerk Approved Items filed: Draft report from the Community Development Task Force. Copy of Sedimentation Ordinance prepared by P. A. Vesilind