HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19740625- 3t~u
MINUTES OP THE ORANGE COUNTY
HOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
June 25, 1974
The Hoard of County Commissioners of Orange County met on Tuesday, June
25, 1974, at 8 P.M. in the District Courtroom of the Police Building in Chapel
Hill, North Carolina.
Members Present: Chairman C. Norman Walker, and Commissioners Henry S.
Walker, Flora Garrett, Richard E. Whitted and Melvin Whitfield.
Members Absent: None
S. M. Gattis, County Administrator, and Betty June Hayes, Clerk to the
Hoard, were also present.
The Chairman announced that this was the time, date and place for the duly
scheduled Public Hearings on the petitions that had been received from the
residents of the Oaks Subdivision and the Briarcliff Subdivision relative to
the creating of a special Service District for the purpose of securing Eire
protection.
Chairman Walker stated the matter would be heard individually as the two
petitions must be considered as separate issues.
Chairman Walker recognized R. H. Williams, the Assistant Fire Chief for
the Town of Chapel Hill, and Cynthia McSwain, Assistant Town Manager for the
Town of Chapel Hill. He stated that Mr. Williams and Ms. McSwain were present
to represent the Town of Chapel Hi11 at this Public Hearing.
Chairman Walker announced that the Hoard would consider the petition
from The Oaks first. He opened the floor for comments from those who were in
favor of establishing the special Service District.
Trisha Stanford Hunt stated that she had been designated as the spokesman
for the residents of The Oaks. The fprmulators of the petition had expected a
ten (100) cent tax levy and upon learning of the proposed thirty (300) cent
tax levy from the Town of Chapel Hill the residents had agreed to withdraw their
request, therefore, in behalf of The Oaks she was requesting the withdrawal
of The Oaks petition if the Town of Chapel Hill insisted on the thirty (300)
cents tax rate.
Chairman walker announced that the Board would now consider the petition
from the Briarcliff Subdivision. He opened the floor for comments from those
who were in favor of establishing the special Service District.
A resident from the Briarcliff district inquired as to how the thirty (300)
cent tax rate was arrived at and he stated he felt the thirty (300) cent rata
was unfair.
Cynthia•McSwain, the Assistant Town Manager, presented a breakdown of the
1974-1975 cost of fire service operations:
Budget 1974-75 - Operations
Debt Service'- Fire Station
5 8,165 - 1975 ~- Average
13,.020 - 1976
Equipment - Amortized over five years
$ 3,956 - 1975 _- Average
3,242 - 1976
Fire Stations -- 141,210
Amortizes over 20 years with cost
with cost of money at 6%
Fire Trucks - 85,080 .•.
only 2 of 6 amortized over 10 years
wikh cost of•6% _~~
Non Departmental,Charges:
Fringe benefits (.1545% $68,645
of 417,914 salaries}
Vehicle Ins. 744
Liability Ins. 1,048
Fiscal Services (5.85%
of Finance Budget) 6,960
Manager's Office (9.75%
based on budget % and
Personnel % - 13.7) 12,841
$463,574
10,592
3,599
11,297
11,132
90,.238
1
Actual Fire Costs $590,432
Anticipated 10% personnel costs
increase for Fair Employment Act
1974 effective January 1, 1975
.10x1/2 year x 532,219 (Salaries &
Fringe) m 26,610.95 (1975)
.15% effective January 1, 1976 39,916.42
1/1/75 to 6/30/75 26,610.95
7/1/75 to 12/3/75 26,610.95
1/1/76 to 6/30/76 39,916.42
93,138.33
- 3~i ~
Average Per Year 46,569.16 $ 46,569
Grand Total Expenditures 637,OD1
Less (IbTC and Fire
Other Districts 23 ODO
614,001
Tax Equivalent
614,001
22,100/Per penny a 27,784
This does riot include 95% collection factor 1.46
29.24
This does not reflect probable infilation by 1975-76
She explained what formula was need to arrive at the thirty (30~) cent levy.
She stated that it was the opinion of the town that the citizens of the
proposed service districts must bear a part of the cast of the entire operation
and that this operation included the fire stations, fire trucks, other equip-
ment, liability insurance, cost of.personnel, plus the fringe benefits allocated
to the fire department employees and that this total cost as projected for
1974-1975 amounted to 5637,001 and that the Town of Chapel Hill was of the
opinion that the thirty (30G) cent tax levy would equalize the proportionate
share for all citizens since this was the portion that was being paid by the
citizens of the Town of Chapel Hill.
Al Rimmar of Churchill Drive stated that based upon the figure cited he
Finds the cost fair and that he, personally, desires annexation for the
Briarcliff area. Mr. Rimmar stated that the figures, relative to the levy,
that appeared in the paper were apparently erroneous, therefore, he wished
to speak in behalf o£ the thirty (30C) cent levy for the Briarcliff subdivision.
Barbara Loda from Briarcliff asked "is all money paid by the tax payers".
Ms. McSwain answered, "Yes, no state or Federal revenue funds is incorporated
into the fire departments budget", she replied.
It was pointed out that the Revenue Sharing money received by the Town
of Chapel Hill was based on the population living in the city limits of the
town.
Someone from the Briarcliff area asked "why had the twelve (12G) cent and
the eight (8G) cent figures been mentioned". It was pointed out that no
particular figures were mentioned when the petition was circulated. A
discussion ensued concerning the contract that now exists between the Town of
Chapel Hill and the Greater Chapel Hill Fire District. Ms. McSwafn stated
that this contract would be re-negotiated in 1975 and that up until that time
the ten (lOC) cent levy could not be raised due to the fact of the existing
contract.
Another resident of the Briarcliff area asked "if the rate increase had
anything to do with the consideration towards annexation to the Town".
Ms. McSwain replied, "No, that annexation was a completely separate issue".
Russell Seaman inquized as to how the 57:6 milli:ori dollar tax valuation was
arrived at.
Herman Henkle of Briarcliff stated that he was the one who originally
submitted the petition t'o Mr. Gattis and that the valuation was based on a per-
sonal contact with the residents of the area. Overwhelming support was found
in the initial investigation of the matter, he said. Mr. Henkle stated
that he was in favor of the proposed tax as afire could destroy his home and
he felt the tax was well worth the sense of security that it would provide.
Betsy Christian from Briarcliff asked "what recourse does the residents
have".
r..L.~2
R. B. Williams Assistant Fire Chief, stated "No one will come to your rescue".
He pointed out that it is a legal matter and that the fire department cannot
answer a call in an unauthorized area.. He stated that he had no choice in the
matter regardless of what his personal feelings might be. ~
Mrs. Christian stated that she is definitely in favor of being taken into
the fire district.
Len $onanno of Briarcliff asked "who approves the building of subdivisions _.
that does not provide fire protection". Chairman Walker replied, "that the
Board of Commissioners had to approve subdividion plats, however, Orange county
has areas that are without fire protection, but that certain rural fire districts
had been established during the past few years.
Frank Loda asked "if you take the Oaks and Briarcliff if it would cost any
extra money". Ms. McSwain replied, "No'.'. Mr. Loda then stated, "I cannot under-.
stand this and it is not equitable".
Chairman Walker then requested the representatives £rem Briarcliff to raise
their hands. The Clerk counted twenty four (24) persons. Chm. Walker then
requested to have a show of hands as to the number who would favor Briarcliff
becoming a special fire district. Fourteen (14) persons raised their hands.
Chairman Walker then requested to have a show of hands of those who did oppose
coming into the special fire district. Four persons raised their hands.
Trisha Stanford Hunt stated that she had learned the property tax rate for
the Town of Chapel Hill was ninety two (920) cents and that she felt it would
be cheaper to be annexed into the Town and have available all the services
offered by the Town rather than pay the thirty (30G) cent fire tax levy.
Mrs. Bernice Daw of Briarcliff stated that she agreed with Mrs. Hunt, in
that, the cost of being in the city would not be too far greater than the tax
levy that was being proposed plus the citizens would receive the extended
services provided by the Town.
Someone asked "how are you going to make the decision". Chairman Walker
explained the matter would be discussed among the Board members and that
the judgment of the situation would be 10ft to each individual member.
Russell Seaman asked "iE the Town in an attempt to justify the higher rate
would annexation of these areas supply more federal funds".
Ms. McSwain answered, "No, there are not that many of. you".
Jim Wild of the Briarcliff area stated "after hearing the Town's presen-
tation he was fairly much convinced that a thirty (300) cent tax levy is fair
since this is the proportionate share that is borne by the citizens of the
Town of Chapel H111". He stated "peace of mind it will bring to me is worth
it".
Herman Henkle stated that eighty five (85%) percent of those present
voted to join the special fire district and he requested the Beard to confide in
how you make the decision.
Chairman Walker replied that the Board must take into consideration all it
had heard and witnessed.
Mr. Henkle requested the Board to go back to the officials of the Town of
Chapel Hill and try to negotiate: for a lower rate.
Trisha Stanford Hunt stated that she had been authorized to withdraw the
petition of the Oaks as the home owners were against a thirty (30C) cent rate,
however, iE negotiations with the Town of Chapel Hill does allow a lower rate
then the owners might reconsider and be more than willing to accept the lower
rate. She stated she did not want to close the door completely on the matter.
commissioner Henry Walker .inqufred.if there, was any hope that the
~r~arclifrf area mi~ht bg corm)}aa intto the.cit~r limiths a~ time 'in ~h~ nearf
u ure. is. McSwai rep ied, eha Inc czt~z ns or t e ea may pe x ion or
annexation or the Town could take in the area if they so desired". She stated
that the Town is taking the matter under consideration, but that it was not
possible for the Town to consider annexation until after the budget hearings
are completed and other fiscal matters are settled. She also stated that if the
Briarcliff special district petition was approved the Town would only issue a
years contract because pf the question of annexation.
Commissioner Flora Garrett stated that she understood the Town had insisted
upon a two year contract period. Ms. McSwain replied, "that Mr. Kendzior, Town
Manager, had informed her as of this date that a one year contract is the only
thing that would be acceptable. Discussion ensued.
{ ~~.
,f ~~
S
Neal Troy from Briazcliff stated "that he felt some part of the issue has
been lost because if the city can justify the thirty (30C) cent tax levy that
is paid by the citizens of the Town of Chapel Hill the the major point of the
issue is - we do not have fire protection". He stated he would rather pay then
have his house burn down.
Commissioner Flora Garrett stated that she felt the question here is, is
the rate fair.
A Mr. Harper from the Oaks asked "is it not reasonable to assume that the
Town of Chapel Hill be asked to consider changing contxacts for the Greater
Chapel Hill Fire District.
Commissioner Richazd Whitted asked Mrs. Hunt if an agreement with the Town
of Chapel Hi11 can be reached at what tax rate would you be willing to have
your petition negotiated. Mrs. Hunt replied, "I am authorized only to say ten
(1DO) cent".
Chairman Walker inquired if anyone else wished to speak on the two issues.
No one came forth. He then adjourned the Public Heazing.
The Board will meet again on Thursday, June 27, 1974, at 8 P.M. in the
Commissioners Room at the Courthouse in Hillsborough.
C. Norman Walker, Chairman
Betty June Hayes, Clerk
MINUTES OF THE ORANGE COTINTY
BOARA OP COMMISSIONERS
June Z7, 1974
The Board of Commissioners of Orange County met on Thursday, June 27,
• 1974, at 8 o'clock P. M. in the Commissioners Room at the Courthouse in
Hillsborough, North Cazolina.
Members Present: Chairman C. Norman Walker, and Commissioners Henry
5. Walker, Flora Garrett, Richard E. Whitted,and Melvin Whitfield.
Members Absent: None.
The purpose of the meeting was to continue the review of the 1974-1975
County Budget.
S. M. Gattis, County Administrator, and Betty June Hayea, Clerk to the
Board were also present. '
The County Administrator reported on the conversations that he had had
with Mr. Kendzior, Manager of the Town of Chapel Hill, .and several members of
Lhe Chapel Hill Board of Aldermen. It appeazed that the Town would consider
reviewing the matter of the proposed thirty (3DC) cent tax levy for fire
protection for The Oaks and Briazcliff Subdivision at their Board meeting on
Monday, July 1, 1974. He advised the Boadd that they could wait until the
results of the Chapel Hill Boazd's decision on Monday night.
The following Resolutions were read:
"THAT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Orange County
an the 19th day of Mazch, 1974, resolved that a public heazing
should be held on the question of the establishment of a County
Service District within the area of The oaks, as hereinafter set
forth and described; and whereas, pursuant to said resolution, on
the 25th day of June, 1974, at 5:00 o'clock P. M.,'in the District
Courtropm of the Chapel Hill Police Building, the Commissioners did
conduct .a public hearing; that said hearing was held in accordance
with the requirements of General Statutes 153A-302 and notice
thereof was duly given as required by said statute; that the report
required by General Statute 153A-302 was filed in accordance with the
requirements of said statute.
After considering all information presented at the public heazing
and all other information available to the Hoazd, the Hoard finds
as a fact the following:
1 I
That there is a demonstrable need for providing in the district herein-
after described fire protection; that within said azea there are approxi-
mately twenty-three (23) single family dwellings and one hundred