HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 05-18-1999 - 9cORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: May 18, 1999
Action Agenda
Item No. 9-C,
SUBJECT: Approval of Value Engineering Implementation Plan
DEPARTMENT: Purchasing & Central Services PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pam Jones extension 2652
TELEPHONE NUMBERS:
Hillsborough
732-8181
Chapel Hill
968-4501
Durham
688-7331
Mebane
336-227-2031
Purpose: To consider approving an implementation plan that would incorporate value engineering as a
core principle for all County and School new construction or major renovation projects that exceed
$100,000 in project cost.
Background: During their meeting on May 4 1999 the Board of Commissioners agreed to adopt value
engineering as a core principle in the design of all County and County funded School projects. The
Board provided feedback to several issues which are critical to the success of the value engineering
process, including the desired outcomes, the process whereby value engineering would be carried out
and new methods of resource management in anticipation of the savings value engineering would yield
in construction projects.
The Board. endorsed $100,000 as the threshold at which all construction or major renovation projects
would be subject to value engineering. However, any of the entities covered by this policy may petition
the Commissioners to waive the $100,000 threshold if compelling evidence is presented that the process
would yield minimal or no savings to the project.
Based on our understanding, the Board approved desired outcomes of the value engineering process as
follows:
We wish to ensure that an independent review of each building system is incorporated into
the fabric of the design phase from concept through construction. Reviews will include, but
may not be limited to the following areas:
• HVAC systems
• Materials used in construction (brick vs. block vs. stucco etc.)
• Best delivery times/methods for materials during construction
• Design function vs. Design fashion
• Future use potential (ease of adaptability for changing uses and/or expansion of the
building)
• We wish to ensure that programmatic specifications as put forward by the planning
committee or potential users of a facility are questioned as to their functionality vs. their
cost;
2
We wish to ensure that every cost saving means available to the project is explored for
feasibility and implemented when practical.
We wish to see life cycle costing analysis used in the analysis of proposed value
engineering strategies.
We wish to ensure that all value engineering strategies incorporate energy efficiency as a
primary goal.
It was agreed that the recommended service delivery method would have the County contracting
with an individual or a firm to provide the value engineering services. This professional service
would be retained pursuant to County procedures and the state law regarding the selection of
architect and engineering services.
As the Board recalls, historically the County has prepared a request for proposal through which
to solicit the interest and qualifications of qualified firms /individuals who could provide the
service. When the responses are received, there is generally a preliminary screening of
applicants and the three to five most qualified firms/individuals are invited to interview. The
interview team will generally consist of County staff and often a County Commissioner. Since the
value engineer is to be an integral part of school projects as well as County projects, it might be
advisable to also include one representative from each school system (either staff or board
member).
Upon completion of the process, one firm/individual is brought forward for County Commissioner
approval. Under the timeline for selection as presented in the May 4 abstract, this selection
process would commence immediately after the Board's final approval of the process (May 18)
and the recommendation for a consultant would be presented at the June 21 meeting. This
aggressive timeline is being pursued to enable the consultant to gear up for assistance of the
Chapel Hill/Carrboro School system during the summer as they move forward with the Smith
Middle School project.
Other critical elements specifically governing the actions and measuring the effectiveness of the
value engineering process will be developed in conjunction with the RFP process. Based on
previous comments from the Board as well as any new information that is learned during the
interview process with VE specialists, a scope of work for the consultant will be recommended to
the Board at the June 21 meeting. Directions from the Board would then be incorporated in the
resulting contract. In order for the consultant to begin work with the Chapel Hill/Carrboro system
during the summer, the Board would need to approve the contract in substance and grant
approval, contingent upon completion of the contract and Attorney review.
As a point of departure in establishing the scope of work for the value engineer, we would
anticipate, at a minimum, the scope would include the duties listed below.
• The VE consultant would become a participating member of the facility design team.
The design team at a minimum would include the owner, the architect/engineer
designer, and the VE consultant.
• The VE consultant would report to the County Manager.
• The VE consultant would provide periodic reports to the Manager, project owner and
the County Commissioners at prescribed milestones in the project as well as at other
intervals as they may be appropriate.
• The VE consultant will assist the County in developing an interrogatory set of
questions that will be sent to each school, system regarding upcoming projects within
the next 12 months. This information will provide information to the consultant as to
where value engineering issues are being addressed on a specific project and where
there may be deficiencies that the VE consultant will need to consider.
• When the VE consultant has reviewed the questionnaires they will meet with the
design team at the commencement of the project and outline the value engineering
process that is proposed for the project. Since the appeal process, if needed
(discussed later in this document) will require the involvement of the County, it is
recommended that the County be included in this preliminary meeting involving school
projects as well. The VE consultant is expected to use strategies that will accomplish
the desired outcomes cited by the County Commissioners, but also to the extent
possible to strive for agreement among the partners as to the strategies to be
employed.
• The VE consultant will advise the County Manager of any conflicts in opinion that he
believes may result in an appeal being made (see suggested process below).
• The VE consultant will work in tandem with School or County staff who are tasked
with project or contract administration for any County or School project.
As previously indicated, additional refinements would be made and incorporated into the
information distributed for the June 21 meeting.
In the unlikely ' ilkely event that differences of opinion on specific value engineering strategies cannot be
resolved within the design team, the following appeals process is suggested:
• The VP consultant will present ideas to the team that in their professional opinion succeed in
addressing the desired outcomes as adopted by the Commissioners.
• The design team is expected to seriously consider all value engineering ideas and to
incorporate all ideas that support the desired outcomes approved by the.Board. In the event
that the design team, which includes the value engineer, cannot come to agreement on a
particular item that in the opinion of the VE consultant supports a desired outcome, then the
owner may present evidence to the County Manager that the incorporation of the proposed
VE strategy will have a detrimental effect upon the program to be carried out in the facility.
The County Manager shall take steps to mediate or cause to be mediated the dispute- within a
one week period after the dispute is presented in writing to the Manager's office. If this
mediation effort fails, the Manager will immediately place this item on the next available
County Commissioner agenda for consideration by the Board. The County Commissioners
may waive any value engineering strategy proposed if they believe that the evidence
presented supports the owner's contention of program denigration.
The last element of implementing value engineering is to finalize an alternative means to
resource management. As discussed on May 4, this involves appropriating funds for capital
projects at various milestones in the project, rather than a single up front appropriation. To do so
will require a modification to the existing capital policy. A revision reflecting the Board's
comments will be brought back for consideration during an upcoming meeting.
Financial Impact: Funds for the value engineering function will be budgeted in future Capital
Investment plans.
Recommendation: The Manager recommends that the Board take the following action:
• Approve the implementation steps cited herein;
• Designate a County Commissioner(s) to serve on the value engineering consultant selection
committee.
:r'`
X Elementary School
Y School System
Capital Project Ordinance
Project Number 6X- XYX
Be it ordained by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2
of Chapter,
159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following capital project is hereby
adopted.
Section 1.
The project authorized provides funds to
This project will be fmanced with proceeds from
Section 2.
The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the project within the budget
contained herein.
Section 3.
The following revenue is anticipated to complete this project:.
Transfer from Other Funds $0
Bond Proceeds:,, $14,000,000
Impact Fees $0
Other Revenues .as Appropriate
Total Revenue $14,000,000
Section 4.
The following amount is appropriated for this project:
Planning & Design Fees $900,000
Land and Associated Fees $700,000
Construction $10, 000, 000
Equipment and Furnishings $950,000
Technology-$950,000
Other Line Items as Appropriate. $0
Contingency 500 000
Total Project Costs $14,000,000
Section 5.
This ordinance shall remain in effect from July 1, xxxx until June 30, xxxx.
Adopted this XXst day, of , 199X.
- -7-eAA
X Elementary School - Phase I
Y School System
Capital Project Ordinance
Project Number 6X.XXX -XUX
Be it ordained by the Orange County'Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2
of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following capital project is hereby
adopted.
Section 1. The project authorized provides funds to
This project will be financed with proceeds from
Section 2. The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the project within the budget
contained herein.
Section 3. The following revenue is anticipated to complete this project:
Transfer from Other Funds $0
Bond Proceeds $700,000
Impact Fees $0
Other Revenues as Appropriate $0.
Total Revenue $700,000
Section 4. The following amount is appropriated for this project:
Planning & Design Fees $0
Land and Associated Fees $700,000
Construction $0
Equipment and Furnishings $0
Technology $0
Other Line Items as Appropriate $0
Contingency
Total Project Costs $700,000
Section 5. This ordinance shall remain in effect from July 1, xxxx until June 30, xxxx.
X Elementary School — Phase H
Y School System
Capital Project Ordinance
Project Number 6X- -,)=
Be it ordained by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2
of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following capital project is hereby
adopted.
Section 1. The project authorized provides funds to
This project will be financed with proceeds from
Section 2. The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the project within the budget
contained herein.
Section 3. The following revenue is anticipated to complete this project:
Transfer from Other Funds $0
Bond Proceeds $1,200,000
Impact Fees $0
Other Revenues as Appropriate ,0
Total Revenue
Section 4. The following amount is appropriated for this project:
Planning & Design Fees
$500,000
Land and Associated Fees
$700,000
Construction
$0
Equipment and Furnishings
$0
Technology
$0
Other Line Items as Appropriate
$0
Contingency
s0
$1,200,000
Total Project Costs $1,200,000
Section 5. This ordinance shall remain in effect from July 1, xxxx until June 30, xxxx.
Adopted this XXst day of , 199X.
X Elementary School - Phase Ili
Y School System
Capital Project Ordinance
Project Number 6X -XXX-
Be it ordained by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2
of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following capital project is hereby
adopted.
Section 1. The project authorized provides funds to
This project will be financed with proceeds from
Section 2. The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the project within the budget
contained herein.
Section 3. The following revenue is anticipated to complete this project:
Transfer from Other Funds $0
Bond Proceeds $11)600,000
Impact Fees $0
Other Revenues as Appropriate $0
Total Reven ue $11,600,000
Section 4. The following amount is appropriated for this project:
Planning & Design Fees $900,000
Land and Associated Fees $700,000
Construction $9, 500, 000
Equipment and Furnishings $D
Technology $0
Other Line Items as Appropriate $0
Contingency $500.000
Total Project Costs $11,600,000
Section 5. This ordinance shall remain in effect from July 1, xxxx until June 30, xxxx.
Adopted this XXst day of , 199X.
X Elementary School— Phase IV
Y School System
Capital Project Ordinance
Project Number 6X - =,
Be it ordained by the Orange County Board of County Commissioners that pursuant to Section 13.2
of Chapter 159 of the General Statutes of North Carolina, the following capital project is hereby
adopted.
Section 1. The project authorized provides funds to
This project will be financed with proceeds from
Section 2. The officers of the County are hereby directed to proceed with the project within the budget
contained herein.
Section 3. The following revenue is anticipated to complete this project:
Transfer from Other Funds $0
Bond Proceeds $13,500,000
Impact Fees $0
Other Revenues as Appropriate s0
Total Revenue $13,500,000
Section 4. The following amount is appropriated for this project:
Planning & Design Fees
$900,000
Land and Associated Fees
$700,000
Construction
$9,500,000
Equipment and Furnishings
$950,000
Technology
$950,000
Other Line Items as Appropriate
1 $0
Contingency
$500,000
Total Project Costs $13,500,000
Section 5. This ordinance shall remain in effect from July 1, xxxx until June 30, xxxx.
Adopted this XXst day of , 199X.