HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - 19731018~.~~]
1. We have a Recreation Study Commission that is hiring a consultant and
surveying recreaticnal lands and needs, This aonaultant should work
with the State on the Eno State Park in order to establish our long-
range needs for recreation.
2. We are interested in using zoning for the prevention of urbanization
of lands sat aside for the State Park, In order to accomplish this,
we must know as precisely as possible what lands the State intends to
purchase,
On these two issues, Orange must and should move ahead and work together with
the State,
Commissioner Richard Whitted also reviewed the comments he had filed with
the County Administrator. His comments are as follows:
In order Por Drange County to da constructive and effective long range
planning it is necessary for us to have more definite information from the
State about which lands in Orange bounty will be used for the State Park.
Wa need this information to help protect this area from further development
that tends to make land acquisition more difficult and more costly.
In the document on page 6, 2nd paragraph and also in the agreement itself,
item 8, it appears that Orange County should have a voice in any decision
that would locate a water reservoir in Orange County.
Chairman Norman Walker stated that any action on the "Eno" agreement at this
time is premature. He feels that there is some conflict between the Society for
the Preservation of the Eno and some persons representing the Nature Conservancy.
Commissioner Flora Garrett said she felt the Board of Commissioners should
now write Dr, Cooper and point out some of the deficiencies in the preser_t agreement,
We should suggest possible changes to remedy these deficiencies.
Commissioner Henry S, Walker stated he did not object to the oomments of
Commissioners Flora Cxarrett and Richard Whined,
Upon-.motion of Commissioner Flora Garrett, seconded bq Commissioner Henry S,
Walker, it was moved and unanimously adopted, that copie's of the comments she
and Commissioner Whined had made be sent to Dr, Cooper along with the suggestion
that they be fnborporated in the next draft of the agreement,
The County Administrator briefly explained an easement being offered to the
County by General Electric Corporation for the relocation of a 12" water line around
the end of a proposed addition to the plant in Mebane, This relocation was to be
done at the General Electric Corporation's expanse, The Bvard of Commisaienera
accepted this relocation and directed the County Attorney to have the easement
recorded and to advise the @eneral Electric Corporation.
There being no further business to coma before the Soard the meeting was adjourned
to meet again on Thursday, October 18, 1973, at 7:30 o'clock P,M, in the District
Courtroom of the Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina for the purpose of
reviewing tax assessments,
C. Norman Walker, Chairman
S, M, Gattis, Acting Clerk
MINUTES OF THE ORA2dCrE COUNTY
$OARD OF COMMISSIONERS
October 18, 1973
The 3pard of Cotmmissioners of Orange County met in speoial session on Thursday,
October 18, 1973, at 7:30 o'clock P., M. in the District Courtroom of the County
Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina, as a Board of Equalization and Review.
Members Present: Commissio~ier's Henry 5~ Walker,-Flora Garrett, Richard E,'
Whined-and Melvih-Whitfield: - -
Members Absent: Chairman C. Norman Walker.
This meeting was called in order that the Board of Commissioners might reach
a final decision on tax assessment of the following properties:
_~.~~
CHPAEL HILL TOWNSHIP
#132 A. J. Altemueller 2Li.-26B
Set lot value at $20.00 per foot
No Change 18-12
#235 ~ R. L. Andrews (F-35
No Change
#306 Flurry S. Afecan 11!}A-E-3
No Change
#119 V, Dawn Bryon 78_A-SC
Set land value at $600. No change in House
#88 Paul Blake 100-C-2 and 100-C-3
No Change in either
#7 H, G, Baity 7-73-6
Set ].and value at 9000 per acre. N o ahange in house
#25 Weston LaBaxre 15_A_5
Reduae land from 2g, 700 to 26,9D0.. Building 30,000 to 27,700
#29 Evelyn Bartlett 39A-A-10
Ne:z value of 55,900
#110 G, 0. Blackwood 130-C-5
Take buildings off this tract.
Do not ohange value 130-C-SA
No bui],ding on tract 130-C-5B, Set value at l~.la.,800
#122 Ezra Bernell •93-H-2~ and 93-H-25
No change on either
#111., William K, Brinkhouse 95-C-16
Reduce value from 21,000 to 18,500
#146 Don Sea.]. 111-11
New value 11x,600
#7.75 L, A. Branton q7-B-20
Old value 26,900 New Value 20,900
#211 Mrs. H. F, Boone 99-11
Set new value 9,600
#97 George Barham 101x.-B_1
Set value at 25,000 by adding extra depreciation
#99 Mary G. Burrell 87-J-20
Old value 52,100 New value 1}2,000
,~r223 Paul Bursae 128-C-7
No change
#228 s. E, Bradshaw 88-A _5
New value 37,1OD
88-A-6 No change
#280 Mary E. Bell 121-B-10
Set new value at L~2,300
#336 Harry Brashear 126-D-1~
Idew value l.~1,400
#86 Kenneth Cheek 10-la.
No change
11~.-C _1 Set land at 3,000 per sore
#109 J, C. Callaghan 57-E-6D
No change
#172 N. J, Covington 27-E-11
No change
'~~-1.3 Sohn Cate 23-C-31
Building 10,500 Land 66,900
23-C-29A New value 9,000
23-A-11 New value 110,200
#2511 John couch 7-5-1OC
No change
~~~
#9S Charles Crum 1134-A-11 and BC-A-1
No change
#68 Maurice Carden 24-10
New value 20,6DD
#217 John Coueh 46-B-1
New value 262,600
#279 Don Collins 19-7
New value 3,400
#314 John Cates 82-B-4 and 7S-B-l
No change.
#1~6 E. A. Dollar 127-A-5
New value 14,11.00
127-A-6
New value 16,400 -
#81 C. W, Davis 108-4, 87-B-6 and 10-3
No change
to-z~. New value 38,400
#l16 I. W, Durham 107-8-31
New value 27,500
96-C_$ No change
#278 H. M. Davis BA-B_6
New value 1900
#28l George Davis 12-23
New value 90,800
#157 C. W. Durham 112-31
New value 42,600
#16s D. 3t, Pierre Dubose 52-6
New va7.ue
#20 Beatrice England 128A-C-3
New value 55,SoD
#55 Leon Ennis 44-8-1
No change
#237 Jane K. Edwards 12S-C-1
New value 4000
#89 Norma J. Elder 57_E_14
New value 11,400
#82 Cleveland Fogleman 98 :i-16
New value 15,700
107A-B-123 New value 4,000
98-N-11 No change
#189 Sim Farlow 112A_12, 112A-15 and 105-4-2A
No change
33-D-10 new Value 25,000
#91 Archie Fields 67-F-1
New value 4p,200
#230 James Foley 120AwE_12
New Value 37,600
#335 T. M. Greene 24-34, 211.5-A-13, 24B_A-14-, 24.E-8-2,
21}E-D_°, 211-E-D-10, 33-E-5 24E-D-11,
24E-D-12, 24E-D_17, and 2~j.E-D_18
No Change on these
#22a Tazwell L. Gardner 95-B-'~{.
No Change
#32 Herb Holland 92-C-q
No Change
s28-F-4 New Value 4,600
#60 A, B, Hayward 108-1$
New value 2500
#138 9. Tom Holland 126-D-5
New value 47,000
#92 Clgde Hogan 19 -23
New Value 145,300
x.39
#154 Fred Hazard 16-116
New Value 69,!}00
x224 Mrs. Robert He amen 69-8,.15
New value 43,00
#221} Marion Hannay 39-D-9
New value 9,300
39-D-10 New value 65,800
#69 A. K. King 88A-7.4
New value 37,000
#2 William Lower 46-C-1
New value 2},100
#108 Keith Little 87-B-12
New value 20,200
T149 William Lock 120A-C-2
New value
There being no Purther business to coma before the Board of Equalization
and Review the meeting wsa adjourned to meet again on October 25, 1973.
Henry S. Walker, Via® Chairman
S, M. Gattis, Acting Clerk
MINUTES OF THE ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMI3S20NERS
oatober 25, 1973
The Board of Commissioners of Orange County met in special session on
Thursday, October 2$, 1973, at 7:30 o~clock P.M. in the Aistrict Courtroom of
the County Courthouse in Hillsborough, North Carolina, as a Board of Equalization
_, and Review.
Members Present: Commissioners Remy S. Walker, Flora Garrett, Richard E.
Whitted and Malvin Whitfield.
Membexs Absent: Chairman C. Norman Walker.
This meeting was called for the purpose of reviewing tax assessment
on the following properties:
CHAPEL HILL TOWNSRIP
#149 William Lvek
128A-A-3 New value 4500
128A_C-2 New value 440D
128A-C-4 New value 4900
128A-A _1 No change
128A_A-2 No Change
128A-$-1 No change
128A-B-2 No change
128A_B_g No change
128A_C_1 No change
128A-A-6 No change
#156 Samuel Lvngiotti 51-F-12A
New value 38,800
#215 Hermon Lloyd
54-C-17 New value 60,400
54-C-15A No.ohange
54-B-2 No change
54 ~-18 No change
27.-8-8 No change
#277 Walton P. Lloyd 24-27A
No change
#337 Reba Lineberger 80-B-13 and $O-C-S
Appeals withdrawn