HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - 02-17-2009 - 6e ORANGE COUNTY
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT
Meeting Date: February 17, 2009
Action Agenda
Item No. - e
SUBJECT: Alamance County/Orange County Boundary Line NCGS Survey
DEPARTMENT: County Manager PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) No
County Commissioners,
Planning, GIS
ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT:
1. Example of Varying Boundary Line Willie A. Best 245-2308
Locations Craig Benedict 245-2592
2. Letter to Residents Steve Averett 245-2501
3. Notes from Meetings
4. Tables and Charts
5. Maps Illustrating Areas of Concern
PURPOSE: To provide a report on the results of the North Carolina Geodetic Survey (NCGS)
and the public outreach and to discuss strategies to resolve Alamance/Orange Boundary line
issues.
BACKGROUND:
patxr
ti
In 1849, Alamance County was established from part of Orange County. Over the years, the
line between the two counties has become less descript and more of a tax operational
agreement. In addition, the exact field location of the 1849-described line has been disputed as
new developments sought to understand the clear location and differentiation of county
services.
Prompted by a lawsuit, the Boards of County Commissioners of Alamance County and Orange
County requested in the spring of 2008 that the NCGS, an agency of the State of North
Carolina, prepare an initial survey of the Alamance/Orange county line. The purpose of this
undertaking was to correctly map the original 1849 Alamance/Orange county line using modern
survey methods. The State's survey and mapping efforts would not change the county line, but
would establish its physical location on the ground, which may vary from the lines developed by
the tax and GIS departments over the years.
The two Boards of Commissioners pursued this process, established under North Carolina law
to deal with situations such as this one, where the location of a boundary between counties is
uncertain.
2
NC 1N s
The NCGS field-located the original line description to the best of its ability during the summer
of 2008. The proposed `NCGS line' (shown in green on Attachment 1) has been mapped on •
the GIS drawings of both counties and compared to what the counties had determined as
boundary line locations. These other lines are shown as Orange County (orange) and
Alamance County (purple). As can be seen on Attachment 1, there is variation in the line
locations on the map.
Upon completion of NCGS work, Orange County and Alamance County staff were able to
assess which properties were affected and mailed letters (sample provided at Attachment 2) to
422 individuals that were in the vicinity of the verified line as well as the boundary lines from
each county. To assist in the determination of a permanent resolution for the line, Alamance
and Orange County staff sought public input.
Two public information meetings were held regarding the county line and residents were
encouraged to attend a meeting to learn more and ask questions. The dates, times, and
locations of the public information meetings were as follows:
Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 6:30 p.m. -- Hebron United Methodist Church —
Fellowship Hall, 2325 Mebane Oaks Road, Mebane.
Thursday, September 4, 2008, 6:30 p.m. — Mebane Arts and Community Center, 622
Corregidor Street, Mebane.
Additionally, a website has been established to provide responses to anticipated questions.
The website address is: http://www.co.orange.nc.us/planning/NCGSCountyBoundary.asp.
The summary notes of the outreach meetings are provided at Attachment 3. The charts and
tables analyzing responses are included at Attachment 4.
A brief update was given to the BOCC on October 7, 2008 by Assistant County Manager Willie
Best. Identification of different options was requested.
y1
„ ■{
KGiiY ibPcf.B
On January 22, 2009, Orange County and Alamance County staff met to discuss next steps and
review legal research developed by the Alamance County Attorney. Next steps include a review
and analysis of three possible options addressing implementation of the NCGS line or an
alternative boundary.
The staffs of both counties suggest a joint county commission meeting for late February or early
March to discuss options for both Boards to resolve through consensus. The joint meeting
would allow both Boards to hear the positives and negatives associated with any of the
proposed options. The Boards may elect to maintain the boundary line as surveyed by NCGS
3
or recommend modifications of particular surveyed areas. In addition, an NCGS representative
would be invited to answer any inquiries the Boards may have concerning the survey.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There has been no financial impact for the survey currently. Based
upon recommendations from the staff to the BOCC, there may be some cost if the boundary
line is adjusted or altered to mitigate impact to a select group of owners.
RECOMMENDATION(S): The Manager recommends the Board:
1. receive the report as information, and
2. request staff to schedule a joint meeting with the Alamance County Board of
Commissioners within the next two months.
Attachment 1 4
Example of Varying County Boundaries
t
LL
3
CASVbELL P RSON
ALAMANCE ORANGE
Alamance Co 1 inch=75D feet
-�-- NCGS Proposed � Feet
Orange Co
Orange County Planning and Inspections Department
GIS Map Prepared by Brian Carson February 05,2009
•
A16104.4-• a
(County COUNTY
kii0 ttar ante (County �'` „e, ORANGE 4 Val■ 1
` ET-; - C fol a olthe county Manager
';
OFFICE of THE cowry MANnGER � ,�:.� • 20o sa,n, street •
124 West Elm St,Graham,NC 27253 Poet Office Box 8181
y� �� I-Msborough,Nolth Carolina 27278 •
'1411i 00,-; DAVID L SMITH TeL (336)228-1312 ����i ea��ti�� Laura E Blackmon Tel.(919)2452300
County Manager Fax(336)570-6788 County Manger Fax (919)644-3004
August 12,2008 Map ID: 2
NAME
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE ZIP
Dear Property Owner,
The Boards of County Commissioners of Alamance County and Orange County have requested that the North
Carolina Geodetic Survey(NCGS),an agency of the State of North Carolina,prepare an initial survey of the
Alamance/Orange County line. The purpose of this undertaking is to correctly map the original 1849
Alamance/Orange County line using modern survey methods. The State's survey and mapping efforts will not
change the county line,but will establish its physical location on the ground which may vary from the lines
developed by the tax departments over the years. •
There are differences between where county officials believe the line is situated on the ground and on maps and
where it actually is(see the attached map showing where Orange County[orange line]and Alamance County
[purple line]have noted boundaries in their respective land records). With an increase of residential and
commercial development along the Alamance/Orange line,it has become increasingly important to be able to tell
people with certainty in which county all or portions of their property lies. The two Boards of Commissioners are
pursuing a process established in North Carolina law to deal with situations,such as this one,where the location
of a boundary between counties is uncertain. The process will provide a permanent resolution as to the location
of the county line.
An important part of the process for both counties is to receive public input before the two Boards of
• Commissioners take any formal action to legally finalize the physical location of the county line and its mapping.
The Geodetic Survey team worked in the field throughout June and July of this year to place monuments in the
ground to mark critical points along the surveyed line. Once the survey is completed,they will prepare maps and
provide information to both counties. A copy of the preliminary map of the NCGS proposed line in the vicinity of
your property is provided with this letter. Please note,however,the line is not yet finalized and will not be
finalized until after NCGS completes its work,and the Boards receive and consider public input. Property lines
shown are approximations based on data from both jurisdictions.
Two public information meetings will be held regarding the County line and citizens are
encouraged to attend a meeting to learn more and ask questions. The dates,times,and locations
of the public information meetings are as follows:
Wednesday,September 3,2008,6:30 p.m.Hebron United Methodist Church—Fellowship Hall,
2325 Mebane Oaks Road,Mebane.
Thursday, September 4,2008 6:30 p.m. Mebane Arts and Community Center,622 Corregidor
Street,Mebane.
Additionally,a website has been established to provide responses to anticipated questions. The website address
is:http://www.co.orange.nc.us/planning/NCGSCountvBoundarv.asn. We also wish to offer you the opportunity
Sian-tame Count
ORANGE COUNTY
- '• 02207 dale County Manger
A ' OFFICE OF 11-E COUNTY MANAGER `F ZOO 9oulh Camexon elreet
ye. 124 West Elm St, NC 27253 Post.Noit Bat 8181
rs``y 11i11sborou0h,North Cao6ra 27278
.yam 1l
14.4 q DAVID L SMITH Tel. (336)228-1312 �. ,•• Laura a Bludgeon Tel.(919)245-2300
• Canty Manager Fax(336)5706788 `� eaca County Manger Fax (919)644.3004
to communicate directly with Alamance County and Orange County officials about any questions or concerns you
may have about how the final determination of the county line's location may impact you,your family,or your
property. You also may wonder how this process may affect your tax bill;who will provide fire protection to
your property;where your children may go to school;where you may vote;or about many other understandable
concerns.
Please contact us by August 25 with any specific considerations you would like to bring to the attention of both
governing boards before they conduct a more formal public input process in September and October. The earlier
we hear from potentially affected-property owners and citizens,the better job we are likely to do in planning for
government service delivery changes. Primary points of contact for each county staff follow our signatures at the
end of this letter.
Both county governments are aware from past experience that the process of determining the location of uncertain
boundaries can be unsettling and frustrating for citizens affected by a boundary line's location. We recognize
that,in the end,we may not be able to satisfy every consideration that every property owner may wish to see
addressed. Please be assured that we want to know of your concerns and will do our best to ensure that issues you
may identify to us will receive consideration from governing boards and staff as we work with the State to resolve
the location of the Alamance/Orange boundary line.
If the County Boards of Commissioners decide to make changes to the initial survey map following the public
input process,the North Carolina Geodetic Survey will perform additional field work reflecting the agreed upon
changes and the revised map will be submitted for approval.The Boards would meet again for final survey
approval. Once the map is approved by both Boards of Commissioners,a final survey plat will be prepared by the
North Carolina Geodetic Survey and recorded with the respective Register.of Deeds in both counties and in the
records of the North Carolina Secretary of State.
At a future date to be determined,real property will be taxed based on the county in which it is physically located,
as set forth on the final survey. County staff and attorneys will work with School Boards and staff to try to
develop any agreements that may be possible between the School Boards of both counties to allow students of
affected families to attend school in the system they may already be attending. County staffs will also work
together to coordinate service delivery planning considerations related to voter registration,public safety,human
services,and many other county services.
It is the intention of both counties to provide notice of the surveying of the boundary line to all residents and
property owners who could potentially be impacted by the final determination of the location,of the boundary •
line. If you believe we may have overlooked one or more of your neighbors in the notification process,please
feel free to share this letter with them and invite them to contact us as well with any questions or concerns about
the process.
Very truly yours, Cordially,
141.4"4`
David Smith Laura E.Blackmon
County Manager County Manager
• Alamance County Orange County
• �c
,, YR11tTltte �OUlttp z ORANGE COUNTY
Office den Carty Manager
4f At\ , ►y= - 200 sbufh C3rn�erun 8reet
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY MANAGER
Po.dhomtmtBac 6181
124 west Elrrr st..Graham,NC 27253 [�;- = Hl aboroudr,North Quaid 27278
N' Laura E IMaetaaen TeL(919)21'.F2306
q� DJ1{IpL6f�T1fl Td. (336)228-1312 ••r
Camay Fax(336)570.6788 • e•'•` county maw Fax (919)6443001
cc: Alamance County Board of Commissioners .
Orange County Board of Commissioners
AlamancelOrange County Line Staff Work Group Contacts:
Bruce Walker Willie Best
GIS Manager Assistant County Manager
Alamance County Orange County
124 W.Elm Street P.O.Box 8181
Graham,NC 27253 Hillsborough,NC 27258
(336)570-4102 (919)245-2300
brucewalker@alamance-nc.com wbest®co.orange.nc.us
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
. Attachment 3
Public Hearings Overview&Notes(work in process)
Observations:
• Roughly 160 people showed up,125 first day 50 the second day with about 15 people coming both days.
1. THESE PEOPLE SPOKE ABOUT STAYING IN ALAMANCE—THEY WERE PART OF THE N NINTH STREET GROUP.AND
THEY WOULD BE MOVED IF THE NCGS 1849 UNE IS ADOPTED.
Tim Bradley 352—City Councilman-Came both days. 1980 built house told not in Orange. Consider Service,Suggests
parcel lines as county line,no grandfather clause because of broken promises when local government turns over. Says
State won't stand by what they say. (They have in court) Follow time honored agreements. They let Mill Creek be
approved without checking to see if it is right. Eminent Domain? Recommend that the Line follow agreements last
- number of years. 1960s 1900s agreements?
•
Ann Robins 333—Letter. Came to both meetings. Can't pay any more taxes. Petition people,they did not know about
the issue? Everybody polled stated that they were in Alamance except one woman. Had to pay to have her kids in
Alamance. 1977 Orange County let them into Alamance. Started 1978. 1948 Tax maps show line where they think it
is. All about money. Quotes from Commissioners. "Please consider moving the line,or leave us as we are." 15 year
old and 4 year old for schools? How they came up with line. Petition? People said they were in Alamance County. Not
Consistent. Son had trouble,when they went to both counties.
Janet Evens 336—Came both days.. We are in Mebane city limits? Rescue had to wait Buses. Disability. DSS Medicaid
Too Emotional an issue. Husband Died. We are destroying everything. Leave us alone. Delay from one county to
another? DSS Services Transition? Poor.
Todd Bradley 353-Split Property. Problem allowed by the government Least Impact because. "Who is going to pay
for Grandfather dauser Problems to keep up with grandfather dauses though. What happens when Govt.turnover
of staff? Then things could change again?
Steve Petty 340—All his in Alamance. Change to rental property.
Tara Hefferman 348—Came both days"We are trying to ruin her family." Leave us alone,Children upset Money Grab.
Can't afford higher tax. No one would buy her land. What are the Pros? (Not an issue 10 years from now)
Karen Alchacar 327— 4 Sons. Gadgets. We know where the line is you don't need technology.
Steve Mcgilvray 356—One additional house over. Commissioners not here? Why 90%angle on Line. Why straight
line? Whole household in schools. 100%for not moving this line period.
Chris Childress 331-Promised public Hearing,whose listening? Façade,waste of time.
Charles Laberth 361—Two Title searches. No Benefit. For 17 years. Retired. For new development,fine,use the line.
2. THESE PEOPLE SPOKE ABOUT STAYING INALAMANCE—THEY ARE FROM DIFFERENT AREAS OFALAMANCE COUNTY
AND THEY WOULD BE MOVED IF THE NCGS 1849 UNE IS ADOPTED. •
James Howington 377—Split Property Trailer Park behind Mill Creek. Surveyed Alamance County Tax Office all in
before. Partially split.
Sandra Poole 265-45 years in Alamance. 77 acres. Upon further review not split through house. If moved her
residence would be in Orange. Not sure she understands split.
•
0
Susan Martin 223—Line cuts property in half. Most of house is in orange. Kids stay in School. Who decides when split.
John Smith states that they would decide with the homeowner. Leave us alone. (Most Ukely Household would stay in
Alamance,but property split.)
Wendy Nelms 221— Leave us alone.
Joe Stuart 367—MILL CREEK in Alamance now would be changed. The Plat is off for those three homes. Surveyor was
off. Stay in Alamance&do not want grandfather clause either because he wants to stay. Mebane approved plat.
Michael Madden 368-MILL CREEK Family 150 years. Came back to Alamance County. Wife is school teacher. Line
through property and is deeded in both counties. One of three in Mill Creek. Would have to move. Money? Why are
we here? Mat line is wrong. Mebane Checked? Want to stay. Honor what you have told me(Mebane and Surveyor
told him?).
3. THESE PEOPLE SPOKE ABOUT STAYING INALAMANCE—THEY WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED IN ANY WAY(PROPERTY
OR HOUSEHOLD)IF THE NCGS 1849 LINE IS ADOPTED.
Kevin Moss 234—Chestnut Oak Dr.Phones as a question?
•
Peter Childers 406—Morrow Mill Rd.2002 court case. 1996 when moved in. 3 years research. Good Information.
Aggressive county was Orange. Drunken Assessors. Confusing now but if you meander then even worse. Could have
been fixed 15 years ago. Grandfathers for people with fixed incomes,or schools. Grandfather in(Everything). Use
Historical Line. 563-8812
•
Donna Lawson 248—Mebane Oaks Rd.
•
Janet Labrim-263—Just moved in Alamance County.County was primary issue for them as well.
Jim&Barbara Rice 407—Morrow Mill Rd. Thinks he is OK,but don't disrupt our lives. Let people stay where they are.
Margaret Cooper 283—Left hand side of N Ninth St. "Always said the street(N Ninth St)is the dividing line." "Glad to
lay her head in Alamance Countyl"
30.THESE PEOPLE SPOKE ABOUT STAYING IN ALAMANCE—THEIR HOUSEHOLD WOULD STAY IN ALAMANCE BUT
SOME OF THEIR PROPERTY WOULD BE SPLIT AND BE 101130TH COUNTIES IF THE NCGS 1849 LINE IS ADOPTED.
Todd Fogelman 388—Whole family here. School Issue. Stay in Alamance County. 18 years. Property is split and new.
Field Check.
John Good(Son came day before)372-Bought Farm for Family same schools. Wants to stay the same. Field Check.
Teresa Wilson 229-She was told Mebane Oaks Rd. Use Mebane Oaks Rd. Field Check.
James Don Windsor 277&278—Most of two properties both would stay in Alamance. House not affected by line
change. "Who's pushing the button here?" Crooked Line Drunk Surveyors. Use the Line for New Development Only.
4. THESE PEOPLE WOULD BE MOVED TO ALAMANCE-THEY WOULD WELCOME THE CHANGE IF THE NCGS 1849 LINE
IS ADOPTED.
Marjorie Watkins 18-In Orange(WANTS.TO SWITCH BACK TO ALAMANCE)-Was told with a slip on that door she was
changed. She would Change and be happy. Delay in emergency services. She was moved against her will. Would be
glad to change counties.
•
, fa
Forest Hazel 183&200—Oaks Community. 4 properties in Orange all but one would be moved to Alamance. Fix so
that services are right. Would be put in ALAMANCE. Over time line has crept. Would make him happy.
Elizabeth James Blankenship S0—Burlington Address Impact Fee?—In Orange. Look up number and call 336-421-9757.
Thought about access of Land. Would be for the Change. Would be glad to say on the record.
S. THESE PEOPLE WOULD BE MOVED TO ALAMANCE -THEY WOULD NOT WELCOME THE CHANGE IF THE NCGS 1849
UNE IS ADOPTED. THEY WANT TO STAY IN ORANGE COUNTY.
•
Katie O'Brian 171—Don't move me to Alamance newborn son not in schools yet,but they bought In Orange County
for the schools. You don't want to wait 10 years for Tax$value to match what you paid in Orange.
Elizabeth Hillborn 140—Orange County for 25 years no indication.Cut off from Alamance because of River Access. A
physical boundary is dividing the line.
Carolyn McCormick&Mark Peifer 88—Way in Alamance-Care less if Kids stay in Orange. Grandfathering good as
long as we don't pay extra. "Known that they were in Alamance for years." Knows Peter Childress.
AB. THESE PEOPLE SPOKE ABOUT STAYING IN ORANGE—THEIR HOUSEHOLD WOULD STAY IN ORANGE.BUT SOME OF
THEIR PROPERTY WOULD BE SPLIT AND BE IN BOTH COUNTIES IF THE NCGS 1849 LINE IS ADOPTED.,
Robin and Wally Williams 138—Property Spit but Household would not shift counties. Southern Boarder. Would they
have to reregister in Alamance($). As of now a small part would be in Alamance. Restrictions? "Please don't Change
me."
Suzanne Moore 156—Split House most of property would stay in Orange based on 1849 Line. State assembly says tax
payments don't matter? Attorney General Opinion 1977:Rufus Edmonson. 156 Claims Property always had been
Orange County. Subjective Survey. Resale value. Mr.Moore Land$Value. Most Land in Orange.
Todd Schopier 21 -Vacant lot SPLT, -27 Other prop split but household stay in Orange—Bisects the line. "How many
(hands)want to change counties?."Services can be handled with modern methods. Grandfather is only as good as the
previous government. As personnel changes so can the agreements. Allow the people that are affected let them pick .
one way or another. And legislate it forever. Pay half in one county and half in another? (He does not understand as
well as others,that splits are the norm not the exception.)(I believe he wants his household to stay in Orange County,but
was not sure listening to the recording of his statements.)
6. THE REST OF THESE SPEAKERS HAD DIFFERENT SITUATIONS THAT DID NOT FIT INTO THE CATEGORIES ABOVE THEY
ARE EXPLAINED BELOW.
Robbie and Joe Web 181&184—One parcel is all in Orange would switch all in Alamance. The other would be split
with old house in Orange and Land in Alamance. Said registered in 2 counties because property was split.Line has
changes from late 1960's. Knows where the tree was. In 1850's. Didn't care that much which county he would be put
in,but,want it settled forever.
Frances Poe—WANTED TO BE MOVED IN ALAMANCE Not sent letter,in orange,but was allowed to send her kids to
Alamance?10th Street on the Line in Orange. Tuition to move Alamance County? Double taxes. It's not right. Only had
an option with Alamance then went to$900 dollars. Been a dispute for 30 years. Mebane,Orange County,and CC
have not done a darn thing.
Luscious Macerella—WANTED TO BE MOVED IN ALAMANCE On 10th Street. Alamance County Line. We have failed to
take action. 1977 312 N Ninth St. Alamance sent a letter saying that Orange had relinquished. This did not change the
li
line between the two counties. 1996 Orange and Alamance Staff USGS matched Line. 2002 Peter Childres USGS line
judicially stated. Feb 28th 2000 NCGS offered to help counties in a resurvey to the line. Waste of Taxpayer time. if you
want to not follow the law what are we going to abide by? Move me in too if you aren't gonna follow the law."
Everett Green—City Councilman Mill Creek. Fixed income. "Suggested a Strong Committee on how it would affect
people's lives." Showed up both days. 4 points. Western part of Hebron Church. Incorrect on east side(check
description).
Ed Hooks—City Councilman—Economics—Mill Creek(They allowed it.) Then some citizens disagreed with him.
John Smith(Orange Tax admin)—His Preference—"Is house on the Line or split be tax where you want it to be taxed."
Don't want to split houses. Land can be split.
More Comments and Questions from the Crowd
• A citizen asked for a show of hands asking who wants to change counties? 4 or 5 raised their hands. Then he
asked who wanted it to stay where they were and almost everyone in the room raised their hands.
• Many believe this is a Land Grab
• "House on the Market Can't sell."
• Many people spoke not at the podium at first...
• "Spend money on new Schools." New Yorker. Three boys to move. Stated she might as well go back to New
York.
Q. Why did Alamance allow County Line to Move West since the 1960's to happen?
Q. And if it did does get moved do people have the right to sue Orange for restitution?
Q. What is wrong with the line now?
•
•
•
•
Attachment: 4
Alamance. 4113)
Totals
Total Parcels 120 Total Parcels 293
Split Parcels 80 Whole Parcels 93
Split Parcels 200 •
•
•
Total Households 90
To Orange 56 Households Total 200
Split House 7 Shift to Alamance 52
Not Moved 27 Shift to Orange 56
Split Houses(to be determined) 18
Not Moved 74
Vacant Parcels 30
Total Land(Acres) 2047
Land to Orange 661
. Stay in Alamance 1386 Total Land(Acres) 4386
Acreage Shift to Orange 661
kx .y�- 4 a 70'x, iiiii-°y., "a' rt �'g ; Acreage Shift to Alamance 828
.. 9� l'w. ,"Y � 1?ct...v� ��T.•0 : @� �'�d�'K'fi?Y d� �` g
Total Parcels 173 Acres Not Moved 2897
Split Parcels 120
Parcels with Households 200
Total Households 110 Undeveloped Parcels 93
To Alamance 52
Split House 11
Not Moved 47 Letters sent to 422 Parcel Owners
All data and charts(in draft format)based on current
Vacant Parcels 63 info and the use of the 1849 NCGS Line.
Total Land(Acres) 2339 Margin of error around 1096
Land to Alamance 828
Stay in Orange 1511 •
0
•
•
•
13
34 Speakers (who were sent letters) at the Public
Hearings
WANT TO BE IN ALAMANCE WANT TO BE IN ORANGE EITHER WAY JUST FINISH IT
3%
I
t
17%
low
80%
• 14
34 Speakers (who were sent letters) at the Public
Hearings
NORTH NINTH ST GROUP WHO DO NOT WANT TO BE MOVED TO ORANGE
■SCATTERED PEOPLE WHO DO NOT WANT TO BE MOVED TO ORANGE
SCATTERED PEOPLE WHO DO NOT WANT TO BE MOVED TO ALAMANCE
■PEOPLE HAPPY TO MOVE FROM ORANGE TO ALAMANCE
PEOPLE WHO WOULD NOT BE AFFECTED AT ALL AND WOULD STAY IN CURRENT COUNTY IF 1849 ADOPTED
PEOPLE WHO'S PROPERTY WOULD BE AFFECTED BUT THEIR HOUSEHOLD WOULD STAY IN CURRENT COUNTY
IF 1849 LINE ADOPTED
20/
29%
I, - -
18
15
Household (200 total) Shift
Ir Shift to Ala mance Shift to Orange Split Houses (to be determined) Not Moved
a
Shift to Alamanc `
Not Moved
26%
37%
i
to Orange
Split Houses (to Shift 28%
be determined)
9%
NINTH St AREA 4soo
MEBANE, NC
POTENTIAL IMPACT
OF NCGS PROPOSED
COUNTY BOUNDARY 4627
Map prepared by Orange Co.GIS May 12,2008 _ _ /1 Wm la 00O20H11C:\MXDs\NCGS Boundary\Mebane Ninth Stmxd 20 _
Implied impacts are subject to change based on the preliminary and �t{I7 062817 = .� 4
conditional status of the line proposed by the NCGS as well as any �Z18 4
future conditions agreed upon by both Orange and Alamance Counties. t 11I ow
t7: " 1
1itiu'
IIU AI
7W
603 ' OW
I
sot 4
t °6:602,
4 605 •
I 603 •' v.y _ •■,,
601 ■ wok
4 ! —
—500 ._L . . ME a
44,110 . ■� ..
48 1
1 ._1
N 4 308 II
pp, Rig
W.� j�y,�E 1" = 400' 306- 11
Ir
S 4300 in 1306
LEGEND 41 III
212 a�Streets 0 '„
- - NCGS Proposed Line 4204 ■ ■L 0
1 4_
i :::°:: zoz
dary 4
-120
Mebane City Limits X1
Pa rcel Impact
Orange Co. Impact 1a r I1 L1-.I„.,V..p p O.i,.N-,-,-
IN IIIII
110 fil
GAIN 4�1os
LOSS 108-106
Orange Parcels t 401
/ L____; Alamance Parcels '1111 ,
Proposed NCGS Boundary uu ,i
Southwest Orange Co.
Map prepared by Orange Co.GIS May 19,2008
00O20H\\C:1MXDs1NCGS BoundarylSouthwest Corner AREA.mxd !�i
_ 1
SAXAPA 4.1 CHURCH
1r 1111 v f
ii1i1
Isley Property I jib
163 acres ,eiao l
11110101 LL0 Amok
� itiol Alamance Co. _
Landfill Isabel)Morrow Properties !go 403 acres
I 231 acres '155 acres \d kik -
�� `
ammo,I _ lir \
■ ,
pplill 1111
Bruce Cameron Property
1136 acres I. sp, "m �
,..
n I
I 1 h t
G
N V
VC
w SON: 1"_ 1500' 4
1 ,,,Altri
1
1 LEGEND AI di tali
® Students SHO CORES RIDGE lug® Proposed NCGS Pnts 1 • 1__ Proposed NCGS Line
Streets Haw Rroe
-Haw&Cane
Orange Boundary irpok
O Alamance Boundary 44 1
Orange Parcels
S\\\
Alamance Parcels '
Parcel Impact 740
Orange Co.Impact 6k
TO ORANGE MI
TOALAMANCE ` I J